In this article, we explore why high-pressure system integrity is a unique challenge in the Middle East – and how digital tools are helping operators stay ahead of risk.
Why Pressure System Integrity Is a Critical Challenge in the Middle East
Asset integrity management is a critical focus for oil and gas operators across the Middle East, where industrial facilities rely heavily on high-pressure systems and complex infrastructure. In countries such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Qatar, operations face demanding production targets alongside challenging environmental conditions, including extreme heat and corrosive atmospheres.
While the principles of asset integrity apply worldwide, the Middle East presents unique operational and environmental challenges. Extreme temperatures, corrosive atmospheres, and high production demands make proactive, digitally driven integrity management not just beneficial but essential.
Ensuring people’s safety, while also minimizing asset (economic), environmental, and community consequences, requires more than manual tracking or time-based periodic inspections. Operators are increasingly turning to digital integrity management tools that provide full visibility and control over pressure equipment throughout its lifecycle. These tools help ensure timely inspections, proper witness approvals, and complete documentation for every critical asset.
By strengthening asset integrity management with integrated platforms like IMS, companies in the region can reduce unplanned downtime, improve regulatory compliance, and support long-term asset reliability. Structured, centralized systems also make it significantly easier to align with international standards such as API 580 and API 581.
Unique Integrity and Compliance Risks for Pressure Systems in the Middle East
Oil and gas operations in the Middle East rely on a wide range of high-pressure systems critical to daily production, including pipelines, separators, heat exchangers, steam systems, and pressure relief devices. Onshore or offshore, failure of any pressure-containing component can result in severe safety incidents, environmental impact, and costly downtime.
Operational challenges go beyond system complexity. High ambient temperatures, sand and dust, and the presence of hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) in sour gas operations accelerate corrosion and equipment degradation. These conditions increase the need for risk-based inspections, ensuring inspection frequency is aligned with the criticality of each asset.
Operators must also comply with national and international regulations. Industry leaders enforce rigorous standards for integrity, documentation, and compliance. Inspections must be fully traceable and often require independent witnessing and approval at multiple stages.
Traditional systems based on spreadsheets, emails, or paper records often fall short. They make it difficult to maintain full lifecycle visibility, create delays in schedule execution, and increase the risk of missed compliance steps. A structured and connected approach is needed to manage pressure equipment integrity across complex assets and operations.
Moving from Reactive Inspections to Risk-Based Integrity Management
To manage asset integrity effectively, oil and gas operators need more than quick fixes or standalone tools. Lasting improvement comes from a structured approach built on consistency, clarity, and risk-based thinking.
Key steps include moving beyond time-based or reactive maintenance and adopting strategies that reflect the actual condition and criticality of each asset. This involves defining corrosion loops, assessing damage mechanisms, and classifying high-risk components to better prioritize inspections and interventions.
Clear workflows and defined responsibilities are essential. Inspection schedules must be planned, executed, and verified with proper documentation, especially when regulatory or third-party witnessing is required. Without a reliable way to track these steps, even minor delays or missing approvals can create safety risks or non-compliance.
Access to accurate and timely data supports better decision-making. Field teams need visibility into upcoming tasks and overdue actions, while leadership requires reporting tools that highlight trends, risks, and performance gaps. Centralized information shared across departments enables both day-to-day operations and long-term planning.
Finally, scaling these practices across sites, systems, and regions is critical. As operations grow in complexity, manual systems become harder to maintain and easier to overlook. A connected and standardized approach ensures pressure system integrity is managed consistently and effectively.
Turning Risk-Based Integrity Strategies into Daily Practice with Software
Risk-based integrity management works best when all critical information is in one place. Our IMS (Integrity Management System) software solutions can be combined, allowing operators to manage pressure equipment integrity (IMS PEI), safety-critical systems (IMS SIS), and maintenance decisions (IMS RCM) on a single platform.
With centralized data and optimized workflows, teams can:
- Inspecting high-risk equipment based on actual damage and criticality (PEI)
- Keeping safety functions tested, available, and compliant (SIS)
- Optimizing maintenance for the failure modes that matter most (RCM)
Having all information digitally managed ensures inspections, process safety, and maintenance plans are aligned, risks are tracked, and structured approval workflows enforce regulatory compliance – boosting safety, compliance, and operational performance even in the most challenging Middle East environments.
Готовы к демонстрации?
Вы готовы увидеть IMS Suite в действии? Заполните форму ниже, чтобы заказать демонстрацию!
Elsa Tolsma-de Klerk Technical Writer
Elsa is an engineer with a passion for sharing knowledge. She holds a Master’s in Electronic Engineering and spent over a decade at Sasol as an Advanced Process Control Engineer, where she gained hands-on experience in optimization, control systems, and writing technical documentation. Since 2019, she’s been a Technical Writer at Cenosco, now leading the IMS knowledge base and training Academy team.