Pedir demonstração
Para uma visão geral

Blogue

Innovative Integrity Solutions for non-piggable pipelines

Non-piggable pipelines defy conventional inspection methods due to physical or operational constraints, yet their integrity is vital to prevent catastrophic failures. Learn how innovative technologies ensure safety and reliability for these critical infrastructures.

17 March '25

integrity assurance for non-piggable pipelines

Non-piggable pipelines, often referred to as unpiggable pipelines, are those that cannot be inspected using traditional inline inspection tools, known as smart pigs – inline inspection tools crucial for detecting corrosion, cracks, mechanical defects, and pipeline cleaning. These pipelines defy conventional inspection methods due to their physical or operational constraints, and yet, they still need to be inspected. Why? Because even the smallest crack, leak, or corrosion could lead to catastrophic consequences. 

Here’s a stat that might surprise you: according to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) nearly  40% of the world’s pipelinesfall into this “non-piggable” category. That’s almost half of the infrastructure responsible for transporting the resources that keep our modern world running, like crude oil, natural gas, refined petroleum, and chemical products. Pipelines’ operational integrity is critical to global economies; failure of pipeline resulting in loss of containment of products transported with its attendant environmental damage makes maintenance non-negotiable. 

In this article, we’ll break down what makes a pipeline non-piggable and explore the technologies and strategies being used to inspect and assess them. Because when it comes to pipeline integrity, there’s no room for shortcuts. 

Understanding Non-piggable Pipelines 

So, what exactly makes a pipeline non-piggable?  It typically involves a combination of physical or operational constraints that prevent pigs from passing through and completing an inspection. Here are some common factors: 

  • Small Diameters: Some non-piggable pipelines are simply too narrow in size for standard pigging tools to navigate. This issue is particularly common in older infrastructure where smaller pipe sizes were the norm. 
  • Large Variation Multi-Diameter Lines: These pipelines present challenges for in-line inspection operations due to varying internal diameters. Specially designed driving cups are required to maintain a seal across these diameter changes, complicating traditional pigging methods. 
  • Challenging Pipe Materials: Materials like High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) or nonferrous metals can complicate inspections because they interact differently with conventional inspection technologies and tools. 
  • High Wall Thickness: Pipelines with significant wall thickness can pose additional challenges for smart inspection tools, requiring specialized equipment designed to handle various wall thicknesses. 
  • Complex Geometries: Pipelines with tight bends, back-to-back turns, or unbarred tees create a labyrinth that standard pigs cannot navigate. Add-in transitions between materials or abrupt diameter changes, and you’ve got yourself an inspector’s nightmare. 
  • Flow and Pressure Fluctuations: Variability in pressure and flow conditions can complicate the propulsion of inspection tools, impacting their performance and data acquisition capabilities. 
  • Access Limitations: Many pipelines lack the necessary launchers and receivers for pigging operations. This is especially true for offshore or subsea pipelines where logistical challenges increase the difficulty of inspection. 
  • Aging Infrastructure: Older pipelines often weren’t designed with pigging in mind. Over time, modifications, corrosion buildup, or damage can further complicate their inspectability. 

And let’s not forget specific challenges like wax deposition in crude oil pipelines or condensate buildup in natural gas lines, sulfuric acid corrosion residue —all of which can obstruct flow and accelerate internal degradation. These aren’t just operational headaches; they’re red flags for safety risks. 

How do we Inspect Non-piggable Pipelines? 

Here’s where things get interesting. If traditional pigging methods don’t work, how do we ensure these pipelines stay safe? The answer lies in combining direct assessments, indirect techniques, and cutting-edge technologies. 

Direct Assessment (DA) 

Direct assessment is a systematic, multi-step process designed to identify and address potential problem areas in pipelines. It includes three primary methodologies: 

  • Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment (ICDA): Focuses on identifying internal corrosion by using flow modeling to predict locations where liquids or other process fluids are likely to accumulate. If these high-risk areas show no signs of corrosion, it can be inferred that other sections of the pipeline are also free from internal corrosion. 
  • External Corrosion Direct Assessment (ECDA): Evaluates external corrosion risks by identifying coating faults and areas where external corrosion may have occurred or is ongoing. 
  • Stress Corrosion Cracking Direct Assessment (SCCDA): Assesses the likelihood of stress corrosion cracking in pipeline segments by analyzing factors such as operating stress levels, pipeline age, coating types, and environmental conditions. 

Each of these direct assessment methodologies follow a four-step iterative process: 

  1. Pre-Evaluation: Collect and analyze data to identify high-consequence areas and regions requiring further inspection. 
  1. Indirect Evaluation: Use tools like Close Interval Potential Surveys (CIPS) or Direct Current Voltage Gradient (DCVG) to locate and evaluate the severity of coating faults and potential corrosion areas.  
  1. On-Site Inspection: Excavate high-priority areas for detailed inspection using Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) methods, such as dye penetrant or magnetic particle testing. This step is often referred to as the direct examination phase. 
  1. Post-Evaluation: Evaluate findings and determine remaining life and reassessment intervals. 

In addition to these direct assessment methodologies, Long Range Ultrasonic Thickness (LRUT) technology is also utilized to detect metal loss at locations identified during ICDA and ECDA evaluations.  

Innovative Pipeline Inspection Technologies 

The future of non-piggable pipeline management is all about innovation. Here are some of the most exciting advancements: 

Current Magnetometry Inspection (CMI) utilizes electromagnetic fields to detect anomalies in buried pipelines without physically accessing them. CMI is particularly valuable for identifying corrosion and other defects that could compromise safety. 

In addition to CMI, there are exciting developments in modified pigs and robotic inspection systems designed specifically for the complexities of non-piggable pipelines. Take the Pipe Explorer robotic inspection system, for example. It employs circumferential magnetic flux leakage (CMFL) technology, enabling it to navigate tricky pipeline configurations with real-time control and precision. This system can effectively inspect long seam welds and other hard-to-reach areas that traditional tools often miss. 

Another game changer is the use of AI-powered machine vision algorithms to analyze visual data from inspections. These algorithms can sift through images captured by drones and stationary cameras, identifying defects like corrosion and cracks with impressive accuracy—something that conventional methods might overlook. Plus, AI powers predictive maintenance by analyzing historical data to forecast when repairs will be needed—saving time and preventing failures before they happen.  

These innovative solutions represent a significant leap forward in pipeline inspection technology, providing operators with the tools necessary to ensure the safety and reliability of their non-piggable pipelines. As these technologies continue to evolve, they will play a vital role in enhancing the overall integrity management strategies within the oil and gas industry. 

Managing Non-piggable Pipelines with IMS PLSS  

Regulations like ASME B31.8S demand robust strategies for addressing threats like corrosion and stress cracking—but compliance doesn’t have to be overwhelming. What you really need is a solid integrity management system that seamlessly weaves together monitoring, inspection, and mitigation techniques into a continuous improvement process.  

Enter Cenosco’s IMS PLSS (Pipeline and Subsea Systems), featuring its dedicated module for non-piggable pipelines (NPP). It adopts a data-driven approach to pipeline management, aligning with the principles of Direct Assessment (DA) techniques but with distinct enhancements. 

  1. Pre-Evaluation: The process begins by leveraging existing data, including corrosion assessments and risk-based analyses, to establish a confidence rating in the pipeline’s integrity information. This rating forms the foundation for a systematic evaluation process. The system calculates a degradation factor, beta (β), representing the pipeline’s current condition relative to its original design. Based on this β value and the confidence rating, IMS PLSS determines the extent of inspection required for different pipeline sections.  
  1. Indirect Evaluation: In this phase tools like Close Interval Potential Surveys (CIPS) and Direct Current Voltage Gradient (DCVG) are used to assess the external coating and potential corrosion areas. 
  1. On-Site Inspection: With high-risk areas pinpointed, targeted inspections are conducted to gather detailed insights. These inspections can utilize Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) techniques or incorporate advanced technologies like those mentioned previously. 
  1. Post-Evaluation: The newly collected data is reintegrated into the system, triggering a recalculation of β and a reevaluation of the pipeline’s condition. This iterative process continues, enhancing the understanding of the pipeline’s health with each cycle. It progresses with a Fitness for Service (FFS) analysis followed by the Risk Based Assessment (RBA) to determine operational safety, and the remaining life of your pipeline and plan future inspections.  

As we’ve explored the intricacies of managing non-piggable pipelines, it’s clear that systems like IMS PLSS offer a transformative approach. By building upon traditional Direct Assessment techniques with enhanced confidence ratings and degradation factors, IMS PLSS provides a more nuanced understanding of pipeline health. By embracing these advanced methodologies, you can elevate operational safety and plan inspections with precision, setting a new benchmark for non-piggable pipeline management that’s both robust and data driven.  

 Want to see IMS PLSS in action? Request a demo today! 

Pedir uma demonstração

Ready to see IMS PLSS in action? Fill out the form below to get started.